And what appears to be the common thread tying many of these writings together? Trig Paxson Van Palin. Yes, the youngest child of Todd and Sarah Palin, who infuriates many "progressives" simply by existing, it seems.
Some of them, not having any writing talents (as if I have any room to talk there...) use the rather pedestrian tactic of making fun of his name. Now, it's obvious to most people in America that Todd and Sarah used rather, well, unorthodox names for their children, but so what? I've lost count of the number of times I've heard their precious little boy referred to as "Twig". Seriously, that's incredibly lame.
(But Snowed, your side makes fun of Obama's name! Do I? Have I? Ever? I don't think so.)
And then, of course, there are the people who are bent on finding some long-lost proof that Trig is not Sarah's son (spoken about previously in this blog here, so now I don't have to mention a certain former editor of The Atlantic). Most recently, this mantle has been taken up by some professor at Northern Kentucky University named Brad Scharlott. This guy, fueled, it seems, by a few Palin-hating blogs in Alaska read by about the same number of people as read mine, has tried to beat the dead horse of Trig Palin's parentage using the same old thought that Bristol Palin must have been Trig's real mother, even though she had a child of her own just over eight months later. John at Verum Serum gives this idea all the attention it deserves:
The fatal flaw with this theory is that back on September 1, 2008 Bristol Palin was announced to be five months pregnant with a baby who would eventually be known as Tripp Palin. Tripp was born December 28th. Even liberal bloggers noticed that it would be difficult for any woman to give birth to Trig on April 18th and then give birth again on December 28th. How does Dr. Brad Scharlott explain this problem away:The validity of the logic that Bristol could not have been Trig’s mother depended on two unsupported suppositions – first, that Bristol was indeed five months pregnant at the convention,and second, that Trig was in fact born on April 18. Concerning Trig’s date of birth, the Mat-Su hospital will not confirm whether Trig was born there, let alone when. (Blogger Andrew Sullivan called the hospital and was told there would be no comment regarding Trig Palin.) And no evidence was offered concerning Bristol’s stage of pregnancy. Thus, if Trig was born, say, in January, and if Bristol was only four months pregnant at the convention, not five as alleged, then the logic of the argument that she could not be Trig’s mother falls apart.So there are two “unsupported suppositions” at work here. Let’s look at those. First, was Bristol really five months pregnant in September 2008? Well, we know she gave birth on December 28th to a health baby which many press outlets reported weighed over 7 lbs. Babies this size are not born at six or seven months of pregnancy, only at term or very close to term.
John goes on, showing photos of proud grandparents, Chuck and Sally Heath, holding what appears to be a newborn Trig on April 18 (for that matter, even People Magazine had, and still has, a birth announcement page for Trig, and that page very clearly was created on April 18, 2008) , so one would think that Dr. Scharlott would give up at this point, but no, he responded:
I am going to revise paper and explicitly say I am not pushing her as the mother. I don’t know who is.
If there was a hoax, ANYTHING is possible.
John entitled his post "Spiral of Stupid", which appears to sum it up nicely. (Now, for those concerned about my tone, I'm not saying Dr. Scharlott is stupid. His theory, however, seems to fit the bill. Honestly, who ever said there are no stupid questions was just wrong.)
(Just a reminder: this isn't even the worst of it for this week. That comes later.)
"Uffda" at Barbaric Thoughts had a few things to say about the esteemed Dr. Scharlott as well:
This is what he teaches:
Dr. Scharlott has taught in Journalism at NKU since 1991. He teaches journalism and mass communication courses.
His research focus is on the relationship between communication technology and society. Additionally, he serves the department by coordinating the journalism department and directing the journalism lab…
Dr. Scharlott has been teaching here at NKU since 1994 and teaches courses such as photojournalism, research methods and news writing.
He goes on to take aim at all the other rumors about Sarah Palin, pointing out that there are also a lot of rumors about President Obama, yet no one takes those seriously, so why are the Palin rumors given any credence whatsoever?
Oh, I remember, it's because it's Sarah Palin, she who must be destroyed.
(Sidenote: I take no responsibility for Uffda's comments about "pea-sized brains". I do not presume to speak to that point, but I will yet again point out that they certainly do have a lot of hatred seething inside them.)
But what really crossed the line this week was a beyond-the-pale post at Wonkette titled "Greatest Living American: A Children’s Treasury of Trig Crap On His Birthday" by some guy named Jack Stuef.
This is Jack Stuef:
As to what Mr. Stuef presents in his piece: before a single word appears, he starts with a sexually explicit picture as part of a collage in which Trig Palin appears. The words aren't much better:
Today is the day we come together to celebrate the snowbilly grifter’s magical journey from Texas to Alaska to deliver to the America the great gentleman scholar Trig Palin. Is Palin his true mother? Or was Bristol? (And why is it that nobody questions who the father is? Because, either way, Todd definitely did it.)
Believe it or not, it gets worse:
What’s he dreaming about? Nothing. He’s retarded.
Yes, that is an exact quote. (There was previously a link in that quote, to a video by a known Palin-hater claiming that Sarah Palin regularly used that word to describe her own son. I took it out because this discussion is already pretty lousy without adding another unsubstantiated, probably untrue, rumor into the mix.)
So, why should I write? Because I have to be better at it than some of these haters are.